In the year 2000 Melly and Anny Beth had reached the peak of old age and were ready to die. But when offered the chance to be young again by participating in a top-secret experiment called Project Turnabout, they agreed. Miraculously, the experiment worked -- Melly and Anny Beth were actually growing younger every year. But when they learned that the final treatment would be deadly, they ran for their lives.
Now it is 2085. Melly and Anny Beth are teenagers. They have no idea what will happen when they hit age zero, but they do know they will soon be too young to take care of themselves. They need to find someone to help them before time runs out, once and for all....
Review:
I read Turnabout around seven years ago, really enjoyed it and felt like rereading it a few days ago. It explores the very interesting concept of 'unaging'. Melly and Anny Beth, the two main characters, are injected with PT-1 which reverses the aging process. At the start of the story, Melly and Anny Beth, along with 98 other elderly people, are offered the 'cure'. The cure ends up being effective for half of the patients and the others die unfortunately.
As time goes on, the patients become younger and begin to be able to to things which they had lost the ability to do such as sit up in bed. However, the dilemma occurs when they realise that the doctors responsible for their unaging haven't figured out a way to stop the process at a specified age (such as 75) and so, Melly and Anny Beth run away from The Agency.
The first time I read Turnabout I thoroughly enjoyed it because it felt so unique. Melly and Anny Beth were interesting, likeable characters and I cared about what happened to them. Reading it a second time was interesting because I had forgotten so many of the details. This time though, I realised that the science behind the cure wasn't explained fully and though I may not have understood it even if there were a proper explanation, realistically, the doctors would have given a fuller one.
I wanted to know much more about Melly and Anny Beth's past because Turnabout was about reflecting on their lives to an extent. I believe that including flashbacks and dreams would have made me like them more on an emotional level. I enjoyed the way the chapters alternated between the year 2000 (when Melly and Anny Beth are around 100 years old) and 2085 (when they're teenagers again).
The book could have been longer and some scenes could have been extended because there was plenty more that Haddix could have explored. The ending felt somewhat rushed and everything was settled very nicely, neatly and unrealistically. At the end, there were some questions that remained unanswered and I really did want to know for certain what exactly happened. However, I understand that 'uncertainty' was one of the themes of the book.
Turnabout did make me feel sad at points such as when a son doesn't recognise one of the patients as his own mother after she escapes the Agency to see him. The plot wasn't as complex as I would have liked it to be but it certainly did have potential. It explored moral and ethical questions and asked how far people would go for science and in the name of science. The future as depicted in 2085 didn't seem too different from 2000 and I wished Haddix could have developed it more.
I liked Melly and Anny Beth as they actually got on and tried to work out their problems. Overall, I enjoyed Turnabout as it was insightful and made me think mor deeply about the aging problem and wonder if this could happen in the near future. I would recommend this to people interested in the aging or 'unaging' process and sci-fi. If you liked The Curious Case of Benjamin Button by F. Scott Fitzgerald or Tuck Everlasting by Natalie Babbitt, you may like this.
Rating: 4/5
Concept: 4/5Cover: 5/5
Author: Margaret Peterson Haddix
7 comments:
definitely something to consider if you gave it a second reading.
Yep, it was good and worth a read but I think it needed more action:)
We read this one a couple of years ago for one our teen book discussions at my library. Lots of good ethical questions. Definitely something to think about!
Sounds like an interesting twist on an old concept. Thanks for the review!
Yes! Thanks for the review ~ this is one I hadn't heard of yet.
AND, I gave you an award on my blog today! http://alicross.blogspot.com
You know, Haddix has had so many books come out lately that I wonder if her publishers aren't rushing her to finish books? Then again, you said this is 7 years old? Hmmm. It still sounds like a good read, though. Reminds me of the Fitzgerald book you pointed out. It was the first thing I thought of, and I'm sure it was an influence. Great review! Very thorough!
@Matthew: You're welcome!^.^
@Ali: Thank you for the award!!!:)
@Carolina: I hope they aren't rushing her! I still haven't read many of her books because they just haven't got any of her books in my library. This one was published in 2000:)
Post a Comment